Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:53

Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Jim Cramer: Why Wall Street is actually going higher after the U.S. bombed Iran - CNBC
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Inside Mark Zuckerberg’s AI hiring spree - The Verge
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
13 Cool New Gadgets to Keep on Your Radar - Gear Patrol
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How can parents identify and address early signs of racial bias in young children?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Weaponizing Tariffs: Top Stocks For The Summer Heat - Seeking Alpha
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
How the Brain’s RNA Rings Are Formed - Neuroscience News
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What is the best TV to consider from an interior design perspective?